Access
Domain registrar, DNS, hosting, content system, code repository, analytics, Search Console, forms, email delivery, payment, booking, and third-party services.
A useful request for proposal gives qualified website partners enough information to recommend an approach while keeping responses comparable. Copy this structure into your procurement document, remove sections that do not apply, and answer what you know without pretending every decision is final.
Introduce the organization, customers, locations or service area, products or services, current sales process, and why the project exists now. Name the business problem and the decision the website should help a visitor make.
Template prompt: Our organization helps [audience] achieve [outcome]. The current website creates [problems]. This project should improve [measurable business outcomes]. The primary visitor actions are [actions].
Separate outcomes from deliverables. A new homepage is a deliverable. More qualified consultations from organic search is an outcome. Vendors need the outcome to decide which pages and capabilities matter.
Do not ask a vendor to invent proof or customer facts. Name the internal people who will provide and approve business information.
Domain registrar, DNS, hosting, content system, code repository, analytics, Search Console, forms, email delivery, payment, booking, and third-party services.
Brand files, fonts, photography, video, copy, downloads, legal text, product data, staff profiles, reviews, case studies, and licences.
Important pages, organic queries, backlinks, conversions, traffic sources, site search, support issues, speed, accessibility findings, and security concerns.
State whether the vendor will receive access during proposal preparation or only after selection. Sensitive access should be shared securely and only when required.
| Workstream | Questions to answer |
|---|---|
| Research | Are interviews, analytics, keyword research, content inventory, and competitor review required? |
| Architecture | Who defines navigation, page hierarchy, templates, URLs, and internal links? |
| Content | Who interviews, writes, edits, sources media, enters content, and approves claims? |
| Design | Which components, breakpoints, states, prototypes, and revision rounds are expected? |
| Development | Which platform, forms, integrations, roles, search, payments, and administration are needed? |
| Migration | Which pages, media, records, metadata, redirects, accounts, domains, and DNS must move? |
| Quality | Which accessibility, performance, security, browser, device, tracking, and acceptance tests apply? |
| Operations | Who hosts, updates, backs up, monitors, supports, reports, and improves the site after launch? |
Ask vendors to list unanswered questions and risks. A thoughtful proposal should expose uncertainty rather than hide it behind a fixed number.
Set weights before proposals arrive. A practical scorecard can consider business understanding, recommended approach, content and search strategy, user experience, technical quality, accessibility, security, migration, measurement, delivery confidence, ownership, support, and total value.
Use mandatory gates for issues that cannot be traded away, such as business ownership of the domain, exportable content, acceptable privacy and security, direct redirect planning, and clear administrative access. References and examples should be checked, not accepted as decoration.
North Star provides website design across Canada. Send the completed brief or use it internally before a scope call so the proposal can address the real project.
A web design request for proposal explains the organization, project outcomes, audiences, current website, required scope, responsibilities, constraints, response format, evaluation method, and commercial expectations so qualified vendors can recommend and price comparable approaches.
It should be detailed about the business problem, required outcomes, responsibilities, known constraints, systems, ownership, and evaluation. It does not need to dictate every design or technical decision when the selected partner is expected to provide expertise.
A realistic budget range helps vendors recommend an appropriate scope and avoid proposals built around incompatible assumptions. If the budget is not shared, require vendors to separate essential work, options, exclusions, and the effect of major scope decisions.
There is no universal number. Invite enough qualified providers to compare approaches without creating an evaluation burden. A short, well-researched list usually produces more useful conversations than sending the RFP indiscriminately.
Include the business owner of the outcome plus people responsible for marketing or content, technology, security or privacy where relevant, accessibility, operations, and procurement. Define each person’s decision role before proposals arrive.
North Star designs, rebuilds, hosts, and supports business websites remotely across Canada. Bring the checklist or brief to a scope call and we will translate it into a clear proposal.
Request a Website ScopeExplore Web DesignResearch expansion
Score strategy, content, accessibility, technology, security, performance, analytics, SEO migration, ownership, maintenance, team, timeline, risk, references, and total cost using published weights and written evidence.