Azure vs AWS
Microsoft renamed Windows Azure to Microsoft Azure in 2014, so if you are comparing Windows Azure against AWS you are comparing the same platform under its old name. Everything below applies either way.
When a BC business outgrows the server closet and starts moving workloads to a public cloud, the shortlist almost always comes down to these two. North Star builds and supports both for clients across British Columbia, Alberta, and Yukon, so the notes below reflect what we actually run for small and mid-sized teams, not a sales pitch.
Two mature clouds, shaped by what each parent company does best.
Microsoft's platform tends to win the day for organizations already living inside Microsoft 365 and Entra ID. Identity, email, and your virtual machines all share the same login and admin model, which means fewer moving parts for a lean team to manage and one less integration to babysit. For a typical SMB that runs Office, Outlook, and Windows servers, that gravitational pull toward the Microsoft stack is real and it saves time.
Amazon's offering, on the other hand, has the broadest service catalog in the market by a wide margin. If your roadmap includes something niche or you want maximum room to grow into unusual workloads, the sheer breadth is hard to match. The trade is that more choice means more to learn and more to configure correctly. Neither cloud is objectively superior. The right pick depends on what you already own, who keeps the lights on, and where your data has to live.
How the two clouds compare on the dimensions that matter.
A factual overview from a vendor-neutral managed services firm. No kickbacks shape these notes.
| Dimension | Azure | AWS |
|---|---|---|
| Compute | Virtual machines that snap into Microsoft 365 and Entra ID for shared identity and management | The widest range of instance types and supporting services to build almost anything |
| Storage | Blob and disk tiers that integrate cleanly with Windows-centric and hybrid setups | Deep object, block, and archive options with very granular cost tiers |
| Sovereignty | Canadian regions available to keep data resident in-country | Canadian regions available to keep data resident in-country |
Where Azure tends to shine.
The strongest argument here is integration. If your staff already sign in with Microsoft 365 credentials, extending that identity to cloud servers, file shares, and security policies is close to seamless. Conditional access rules, single sign-on, and centralized device management carry straight over, so a small team gets enterprise-grade controls without stitching together separate systems. For Windows-heavy shops, licensing and hybrid setups also tend to be more familiar, which shortens the learning curve.
The trade-offs come with that tight coupling. Leaning hard on one vendor's stack can make you reluctant to mix in tools from elsewhere, and the management portal has grown dense enough that newcomers can struggle to find the right setting. Costs can also creep if resources are left running, which is true of any cloud but easy to overlook when provisioning feels this convenient. Disciplined governance matters more than the marketing suggests.
Where AWS tends to shine.
Breadth and maturity are the headline. Amazon has been at this longer than anyone and offers a service for nearly every scenario, which means you rarely hit a wall where the platform simply cannot do what you need. The granular pricing tiers, especially around storage and archival, give a cost-conscious business real levers to pull, and the documentation and third-party tooling ecosystem is enormous. For teams that want to keep their options open and avoid being tied to one office suite, that independence is appealing.
The catch is that all of that choice has to be managed. The console exposes a lot, naming conventions are their own dialect, and getting identity and permissions right takes deliberate effort. A business without internal cloud skills can end up either over-building or leaving security gaps simply because there were too many knobs. With a capable administrator or a managed provider behind it, the openness is a genuine advantage; without one, it can become a liability.
Matching the cloud to your situation.
A Microsoft 365 shop
If your team already runs Office, Outlook, and Windows servers, and your identity lives in Entra ID, the Microsoft cloud removes a pile of integration work. You get one login model and one admin surface across productivity and infrastructure.
A team that wants maximum range
If your roadmap is varied or unpredictable, or you simply prefer not to be tied to a single office suite, the broader catalog and finer cost controls give you room to build whatever the next project demands.
North Star can run it for you
We design, deploy, and monitor both clouds for Western Canadian clients, keep your data in Canadian regions where residency matters, and document the whole environment so you are never locked to one provider. See our cloud and infrastructure service for how we handle this end to end.
Common questions about Azure vs AWS.
We already use Microsoft 365 - does that settle it?
It tilts the decision but does not close it. Sharing identity and management with your existing productivity suite is a real advantage for a lean team, and many Microsoft 365 shops are happiest staying in one ecosystem. That said, if you have a workload that fits the other catalog better, running it elsewhere is perfectly normal. We help you weigh convenience against the specific job.
Can we keep our data inside Canada on either cloud?
Yes. Both providers operate Canadian regions, so you can keep workloads and backups resident in-country to meet privacy and sovereignty expectations. The important part is configuring deployments to actually use those regions rather than defaulting elsewhere, which is something we verify and document on every build.
Can North Star migrate us between the two?
Yes. We map your current configuration, stand up the target environment in parallel, move workloads in stages so you keep running through the cutover, then decommission the old setup. You finish with a documented environment and no surprise lock-in to a single vendor.
More comparisons
Not sure which fits your business?
Book a free 30-minute call. We will walk through your environment, your budget, and your priorities, and recommend the right platform for your team. No vendor kickbacks, no upsell games.
Get a Free Assessment More comparisons